Key Terminology S

What is “separate but equal”?

Separate but equal was the legal doctrine that racial segregation was constitutional as long as the facilities for each race were equal. The Supreme Court adopted it in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896. In practice, facilities for Black Americans were consistently underfunded and inferior.

Under this doctrine, states could require separate schools, train cars, waiting rooms, hospitals and other public facilities for Black and white people. Courts rarely checked whether the facilities were actually equal. Southern states spent far more per white student than per Black student, and many Black schools lacked buildings, books and buses.

The NAACP Legal Defense Fund, led by Charles Hamilton Houston and later Thurgood Marshall, attacked the doctrine step by step. It first won cases on graduate and law schools, such as Sweatt v. Painter in 1950, by showing the separate options were not equal. Then it argued that segregation itself was unequal.

In Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. The phrase is still used to describe systems that are formally neutral but produce unequal schools, neighborhoods and services by race.

Get explainers like this in your inbox.

You’ll be subscriber No. 63,199